![]() ![]() Lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.As a special service "Fossies" has tried to format the requested source page into HTML format using (guessed) Lisp source code syntax highlighting (style: standard) with prefixed line numbers.Īlternatively you can here view or download the uninterpreted source code file. Please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.Īlthough we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's Would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce itĪgainst a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of thisīug to the applicable version. We may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. To a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life.īug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that Plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you This bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora It is Fedora's policy to close allīug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life.Īpproximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintainingĪnd issuing updates for Fedora 11. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. ![]() ![]() Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta:Ī week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm:Īs already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The definition of a font family is given on: It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ![]() Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C -repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' -qf='%\n' |sed -e 's -*\.fc\(.*\)src.rpm g'|sort|uniq ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |